Investigation of the Hermeneutical Approach to Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage

Authors

  • Soodabeh Yousefnejad Urban & Restoration Department, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Author

Keywords:

Restoration; Conservation; Cultural Heritage; Hermeneutics

Abstract

In this article restoration is studied within a hermeneutic outlook. Hermeneutics, as a technique of interpretation, includes a general range of cases and text goes far beyond its classic sense and could include different issues such as art works. Thus, art work is considered as a text having an interpretational status and could be interpreted within different hermeneutical approaches. Hermeneutics in recognition stage functions by rendering the signs existing in the work and interpreting them by different scientific methods for identifying the material, technologies and the damages of it. Different hermeneutic approaches are originally determined on the considerable issue of authorial intent, so that the goal of restoring an art work is to restore it to its original form which conforms to the intent of its creator, or understands the work within the here and now paradigm and with an interpreter-oriented interpretation, i.e., the past is preserved as overlaid by the present. Thus, the restoration process carried on for assessing reliability level in interpretation could be analyzed, criticized and studied through a hermeneutic approach.

References

Ahmadi, B. (2004). Creation and freedom. Markaz publication.

Brandi, C. (2005). Theory of restoration. instituto centrale per il restauro.

Carrier, D. (1994). Restoration as Interpretation: A Philosopher's Viewpoint. In: M. Wendy Watson, Altered States: Conservation, Analysis and Interpretation of Works of Art. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Couzens hoy, D. (1982). The critical circle. University of California press.

Figal, G. (2011). Phenomenology and hermeneutics. Research in phenomenology, (41), 109-154.

Figal, G. (2004). Life as understanding. Research in phenomenology, (34), 20-30.

Gadamer, H. G. (2006). Truth and method, continuum impacts.

Grondin, J. (2006). l’hermeneutics, presses universitaire de france, collection “Que sais je?”

Hirsch, E. (1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven and London Yale university press.

ICOMOS. (2007). Charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites. 1-14.

Jokilehto, J. (1986). A history of architectural conservation, University of York (Doctoral dissertation, unpublished PHD thesis).

Linge, D. E. (1977). Philosophical Hermeneutics: Hans-Georg Gadamer. University of California press.

McManus, H. (2007). Interpretive Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Clarifying Understanding. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 7(2), 1-12.

Meredith, R. (2006). From material to meaning: A multidisciplinary Exploration of Creative Practice and Hermeneutic Theories (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico).

Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press.

Panofski, E. (1996). Historical and philosophical issues in the conservation of cultural heritage (Vol. 1). Getty Publications.

Ricoeur, P. (1974). Existence and hermeneutics. In The conflict of interpretations. North western University Press.

Reynhout, K. (2012). Interdisciplinary Interpretation: Paul Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Theology and Science. Princeton Theological Seminary.

Ricoeur, P. (1975). Phenomenology and hermeneutic. NOUS, 9(1), 85-102.

Scott, D. (2002). Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation. Getty Publications.

Weinsheimer, J. (1991). Philosophical hermeneutics and literary theory. Open university press.

Yousefnejad, S. (2014). Analytical study of Achaemenid Glazed Bricks of Persepolis by multiple instrumental analysis methods. International symposium on archaeometry, the Getty center and university of California Los Angeles.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-20

Issue

Section

Original Article